نسخه فارسي   |   Shqipëria

Iran Used ‘Some’ Nuclear Deal Money To Fund Terror Campaigns

Sep 27
  • Print

Daily Caller,By Saagar Enjeti

Tuesday, 26 September 2017

The Islamic Republic of Iran used some of the funds released to the country under the 2015 nuclear agreement to fund activity in the Middle East, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford told the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday.

Iran was provided approximately $150 billion in sanctions relief under the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal in exchange for giving up some technical aspects of its nuclear weapons program. Then-Secretary of State John Kerry even admittedsome of the money was likely to be spent on terrorism in January 2016, saying, “I’m not going to sit here and tell you that every component of that can be prevented.”

“There are indicators that some money that was freed up as a result of JCPOA has been put back into malign activity,” Dunford told Congress. “I’d be hard pressed to find anything that Iran does that is good.”

The U.S. Department of State 2016 Country Reports on Terrorism also foundthat Iran “remained the foremost state sponsor of terrorism in 2015, providing a range of support, including financial, training, and equipment, to groups around the world.” These groups include Lebanese Hezbollah and other militias in the Middle East.

Dunford’s testimony comes weeks before the Trump administration must decide whether it will certify Iranian compliance with the deal to Congress. President Donald Trump and many senior U.S. government officials indicatedthey will likely de-certify the regime’s compliance, admitting that while the regime remained technically in line with the deal, for pursuing a ballistic missile program along with its continued terrorism sponsorship.

Trump assailed the agreement during his UN General Assembly address, calling it an “embarrassment to the United States” and ominously adding, “I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it — believe me.”

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also appeared to preview a move in early September, telling Fox News, “if we’re going to stick with the Iran deal there has to be changes made to it.”

Decertification of Iranian compliance with the nuclear deal would not necessarily pull the U.S. out of the framework, but would galvanize congressional review of Iranian behavior and spark a new possible round of sanctions on the regime. Trump may decertify Iran’s compliance within this framework, giving him potential leverage on the regime to try and negotiate the deal or face crippling U.S. economic sanctions.

Decertification would also trigger a two-month period of review by Congress and a possible effort by the administration to convince other parties to the nuclear agreement to try and impose further restrictions on Iran.

Kerry and the Obama administration hoped that the sanctions relief provided to Iran along with access to western markets would normalize its behavior within the next decade, before the “sunset clause” on the deal runs out. The sunset clause of the nuclear deal removes restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programs in approximately 15 years.

Critics of the deal say the sunset clause simply delays an inevitable confrontation with the revolutionary regime while providing it with economic access to the international system.

Tagged under
Published in Articles

External Links

Two Misguided Reports

  • HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Report
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Report
    On 18 May 2005, the US based Human Rights Watch (“HRW”) issued a 28-page report (“the HRW Report”) concerning the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (“PMOI / MEK”).  Entitled ‘No Exit: Human Rights Abuses Inside the MKO Camps’, the HRW Report was essentially based on 12 hours of telephone interviews with 12…
  • Courting Disaster, A response to Rand report on People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran
    Courting Disaster, A response to Rand report on People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran
    The RAND National Defense Research Institute published in July 2009 the report The Mujahedin-e Khalq: A Policy Conundrum for the Multi-National Force-Iraq, Task Force 134 (Detainee Operations). The report focuses on the circumstances surrounding the detention of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MeK) at Camp Ashraf and “whether MeK members were taken into custody…