Sanction Iran for terror and rights violations

Feb 19
  • Print
Iranian regime's priority is to fund terrorism rather than  recover its economy
Iranian regime's priority is to fund terrorism rather than recover its economy

By Majid Sadeghpour, The Hill
Thursday, 18 February 2016

Recently the United States House of Representatives passed the “Iran Terror Finance Transparency Act,” which bars removal by the executive branch, of certain Iranian individuals and financial institutions from a restricted U.S sanctions list. Iranian government’s phony diplomatic maneuvering after the nuclear accord should be viewed with the added perspective of Iran’s categorical disregard for basic human rights of its citizens and fueling of the raging violence in Syria. Accordingly, any and all congressional effort to keep pressure on the regime is a right move, and a concrete stop towards addressing the global expansion of Islamic fundamentalism.

Following passage of the Bill, House Foreign Affairs Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said that Iran is “cashing in on a $100 billion jackpot, even as it tests ballistic missiles, seizes American sailors and continues its support for terrorism.” President Obama, he added, ‘must fully enforce sanctions on Iran’s illicit program and confront its dangerous acts.” The bill is clearly part of a growing nationwide interest to place economic sanctions against Iran. As is, “at least half of all U.S. states have laws or policies on the books that sanction Iran. In September, governors from 15 states co-signed a letter expressing their intent to use state-level sanctions to target Iran.”

"Lawmakers have every right to be skeptical of Iranian government intentions particularly when Iran behaves as it does internally and abroad."

The bill invokes congressional authority given to states, allowing them to impose unilateral sanctions on Iran without fear of federal government preemption. This authority is clearly embedded in the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010.
U.S. lawmakers are distinctly worried that Iran will not live up to its commitment under the nuclear deal and alarmed that it continues to act inconsistent with what would otherwise be expected of a state wishing in good faith to join the global community.

Lawmakers have every right to be skeptical of Iranian government intentions particularly when Iran behaves as it does internally and abroad. As a state party to the CRC, “Iran is legally obliged to treat everyone under the age of 18 as a child and ensure that they are never subject to the death penalty nor to life imprisonment without possibility of release.” Yet it instead is a “leading executioner of minors” - despite its pledge more than two decades ago to end the death penalty of minors.

Tagged under
Published in Articles

External Links

Two Misguided Reports

  • HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Report
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Report
    On 18 May 2005, the US based Human Rights Watch (“HRW”) issued a 28-page report (“the HRW Report”) concerning the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (“PMOI / MEK”).  Entitled ‘No Exit: Human Rights Abuses Inside the MKO Camps’, the HRW Report was essentially based on 12 hours of telephone interviews with 12…
  • Courting Disaster, A response to Rand report on People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran
    Courting Disaster, A response to Rand report on People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran
    The RAND National Defense Research Institute published in July 2009 the report The Mujahedin-e Khalq: A Policy Conundrum for the Multi-National Force-Iraq, Task Force 134 (Detainee Operations). The report focuses on the circumstances surrounding the detention of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MeK) at Camp Ashraf and “whether MeK members were taken into custody…