The conclusion says:
57. Closed material was also available to the applicant. We have considered that
material.
It has reinforced our conclusion that the applicant could not
reasonably have formed the view when the decision letter was written in 2006
that PMOI intended in future to revert to terrorism. It is a matter for comment
and for regret that the decision-making process in this case has signally fallen
short of the standards which our public law sets and which those affected by
public decisions have come to expect.
58. In these circumstances we consider that the appeal that the applicant wished to
bring had no reasonable prospect of success and that the appropriate course is
to dismiss her application.
